Log2
This is a sensible idea. Not just a collection of links, but a knowledge tree that gradually becomes an “operating system for survival.” 🌱
I would build a knowledge base, not a blog.
For example:
Infinite Viability
│
├── Foundations
│ ├── What Is Infinite Viability?
│ ├── Antifragility
│ ├── Evolution
│ ├── Autopoiesis
│ └── Complex Adaptive Systems
│
├── Biology
│ ├── Aging
│ ├── Repair Mechanisms
│ ├── Longevity
│ ├── Microbiome
│ └── Regeneration
│
├── Civilization
│ ├── Existential Risks
│ ├── Governance
│ ├── Economics
│ └── AI Alignment
│
├── Mathematics
│ ├── Information Theory
│ ├── Control Theory
│ ├── Networks
│ ├── Category Theory
│ └── Game Theory
│
├── Engineering
│ ├── Energy
│ ├── Distributed Systems
│ ├── Robotics
│ └── Biotechnology
│
└── Reading ListFor each article:
- a brief description (5–10 lines);
- why it matters for infinite survival;
- links to related articles;
- a confidence level (established / hypothesis / speculation).
This is far more valuable than an ordinary list of links.
Authors
To populate it, I would start with authors who repeatedly appear in the literature on long-term sustainability:
- John von Neumann
- Norbert Wiener
- Claude Shannon
- W. Ross Ashby
- John Holland
- Stuart Kauffman
- Ilya Prigogine
- Elinor Ostrom
- Nassim Taleb
- Karl Friston
- David Deutsch
- Nick Bostrom (as a source for framing risks, even if you disagree with his conclusions)
- Aubrey de Grey
- Michael Levin
- Melanie Mitchell
Other stuff
It is also useful to create a separate “Papers Worth Rereading” section—not hundreds of links, but 30–100 works that are genuinely worth revisiting. Over time, such a catalog becomes much more valuable than an endless collection of bookmarks.